Dialogue in Hell between Machiavelli and Montesquieu
The Dialogue in Hell between Montesquieu and Machiavelli is the source of the world's most infamous literary forgery, The Protocols of the Elders of Zion. John Waggoner's superb translation of and commentary on Joly's Dialogue—the first faithful translation in English—seeks not only to update the sordid legacy of the Protocols but to redeem Joly's original work for serious study in its own right, rather than through the lens of antisemitism. Waggoner's work vindicates a man who was neither an...
Search in google:
John Waggoner's superb translation of and commentary on Joly's Dialogue—the first faithful translation in English—seeks not only to update the sordid legacy of the The Protocols of the Elders of Zion but to redeem Joly's original work for serious study in its own right, rather than through the lens of antisemitism. Waggoner's work vindicates a man who was neither an antisemite nor a supporter of the kind of tyrannical politics the Protocols subsequently served, and presents Maurice Joly, once much maligned and too long ignored, as one of the nineteenth century's foremost political thinkers.
PrefaceAcknowledgmentsIntroductionTranslationTitle Page3A Short Introductory Statement5Text of the Dialogue7CommentaryThe Machiavelli-Montesquieu DebateCh. 1The Essential Differences between Machiavelli and Montesquieu155Ch. 2An Elaboration of the Respective Political Teachings175The New Machiavellian FoundingCh. 3The Political Revolution I195Ch. 4The Political Revolution II215Ch. 5The Economic Revolution233Ch. 6The Moral Revolution253The Saint-Simonian Elements in the New Modes and OrdersCh. 7The Saint-Simonian Historical Element267Ch. 8The Saint-Simonian Religious Element279The Drama of the DialogueCh. 9The Portrait of Machiavelli293The Dialogue and HistoryCh. 10Solving the Enigma of Louis Napoleon325Ch. 11The Protocols of the Elders of Zion357AppMacaulay's Machiavelli371Bibliography379Index to Dialogue in Hell383Index to Commentary387About the Author395
\ AzureIn addition to teaching us about the permanence of the possibility of tyranny, and its perverse new forms in modernity, Joly compels us to wonder whether our liberalism or Machiavelli's is truer.\ \ \ \ \ The Review of PoliticsJoly's work is a briliant account of modern depotism, and of the vulnerability of republicanism to a Machiavellianism aware of the manipulability of popular mechanisms. Joly's updating of Machiavellianism deserves to be read as a prophetic and unwittingly influential document. Having detailed the despotism of its own century and inadvertently contributed to that of the century to come, perhaps in can help our century to learn to formulate an adequate response to the all-too enduring voice of tyranny.\ \ \ Richard HassingJoly's Dialogue addresses perennial questions that are now more urgent than ever: What are the prospects for freedom? Is the liberal system universally applicable? Is despotism a benighted remnant of the past or can it develop into new forms? After a century and a half, Joly's thought —repressed, ignored, hijacked, and misunderstood —comes into light [and] his voice is still quite fresh. The bitter irony of the despotic abuse to which this book was put demands redress by renewed access to Joly's liberal, anti-despotic thought. John Waggoner has made this possible for English-speaking readers.\ \ \ \ \ Pierre ManentA fair and timely reassessment of one of the earliest and most acute analysts of modern despotism.\ \ \ \ \ Robert K. FaulknerJoly's is a classic diagnosis of distinctively modern despotism, and Waggoner adds to Joly's text an illuminating commentary. This book has lessons for all who love free government.\ \ \ \ \ The Review Of PoliticsJoly's work is a briliant account of modern depotism, and of the vulnerability of republicanism to a Machiavellianism aware of the manipulability of popular mechanisms. Joly's updating of Machiavellianism deserves to be read as a prophetic and unwittingly influential document. Having detailed the despotism of its own century and inadvertently contributed to that of the century to come, perhaps in can help our century to learn to formulate an adequate response to the all-too enduring voice of tyranny.\ \ \ \ \ Francis FukuyamaJohn Waggoner has done all of us a tremendous service by making available in English the text of Maurice Joly's Dialogue, as well as a penetrating analysis of this neglected work. His insight allows us to better understand the origins of both totalitarianism and anti-Semitism in the twentieth century.\ \
